We use cookies to make your experience better.
To comply with the new e-Privacy directive, we need to ask for your consent to set the cookies.
Now heading towards Round 3, MotoGP 2012 is a changed landscape. So far the new regulation changes that have been introduced have gone some way towards making the racing slightly more exciting for its viewers.
Dwindling grid numbers over the last few years combined with near total dominance by just a couple of teams was steering the sport towards a rather dull existence. Fans, and more importantly for DORNA, viewers demanded change.
So for 2012 the Grand Prix Commission (MotoGP’s rule making group) decided to introduce a raft of changes aimed at increasing not just numbers on the grid but also some excitement.
Increase in engine capacity from 800 to 1,000cc and engines no greater than four cylinder. Originally engine sizes were decreased to 800cc in an attempt to slow the bikes down - yet in pre-season testing that year the bikes were already as fast as the bigger bikes they were to replace.
Most think that the increase in capacity this year will see even higher top speeds being hit, particularly at traditional fast circuits like Mugello. At the front of the grid a horsepower race will no doubt develop throughout the season, but this will leads to bigger gaps further down the field - I'll come back to that in a bit.
The second main change to the 2012 regulations has been the controversial introduction of Claiming Rule Teams (CRT).
Basically this new rule allows smaller independent teams to get onto the MotoGP grid on a substantially lower budget. A CRT operates under a slightly different set of rules;
The big question though is: how this two tier system will play out over the course of the season?
Essentially the CRT bikes are a crossbreed of a GP and WSBK. Pre-season, most CRT bikes were well behind the pace leading to several riders in GP teams suggesting that they shouldn’t be racing together. And perhaps they’re right. Should MotoGP - deemed to be the pinnacle of prototype motorcycle racing - be diluted with a mix of what are essentially just slightly more advanced superbikes? Put it another way. Would Formula One benefit from suddenly allowing GP2 cars to compete in the same races? Unlikely.
Governing bodies, be they the FIM or FIA, are keen to be seen to try to reduce budgets in these sports yet the whole ethos of having the ‘ultimate’ racing prototypes require big budgets. Ask anyone in motorsport - the fastest way to go faster is money. If you can hire the best people and get the best technology you have to buy it.
Including another dozen bikes to a grid that are seconds slower doesn’t increase the spectacle, it merely creates two races in one - the GP race and the CRT race.
Throughout the season the big factory teams will continue to spend millions developing their bikes to eek out every single ounce of performance. After Round 1 the gap is already clear - Edwards (best of the CRT finishers) crossed the line 58 seconds behind first place Lorenzo.
It is doubtful that we will see a CRT bike challenging the like of Honda or Yamaha for a win this year, even if we get a very wet race. I don’t think we’ll get to see a surprise result like when Elias nipped past Rossi to win in Estoril in 2006.
The biggest potential role that I think a CRT bike can play in influencing a result this year will be as they are lapped by the frontrunners in the MotoGP class.
I don’t think its right for the sport, but lets just see how it all plays out.
Now gone is the 125cc category - replaced this year with Moto3.
One thing can be said of this year, there will be closer racing - I’m just not sure that it will be in the top class.
Dave Humphreys
PS I'd love to hear your opinion on the rule changes, just post your opinion in the comments box below.
Dave Humphreys is a Dublin based automotive writing and covers a number of different aspects on both two and four wheels. Check out his own website - http://www.50to70.com or find him on Facebook and Twitter.